Z.A.HAQ
Pramod s/o Manoharrao Konge – Appellant
Versus
Shantaram Balkrushna Dhok – Respondent
Heard Shri Raju Dhoble, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri V.V. Bhangde, Advocate for the respondent.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.
3. The petitioner/original plaintiff takes exception to the order passed by the trial Court by which the application (Exhibit No.27) filed by him is rejected. The plaintiff has filed the civil suit praying for decree for specific performance of contract and for other reliefs. In this civil suit, the defendant filed an application (Exhibit No.18) under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure praying that the plaint be rejected. Before this application (Exhibit No.18) is decided, the plaintiff filed an application (Exhibit No.22) under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking permission to amend the plaint. As this application was not being considered, the plaintiff filed an application (Exhibit No.27) praying that the application (Exhibit No.22) filed by him under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure be decided before the application (Exhibit No.18) filed by the defendant is considered. The learned trial Judge has rejected the application (Exhibit No.27) by the impugned order.
4. The learned Advo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.