1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent.

2. Admittedly, the suit has been filed for injunction simplicitor and there is no prayer for removal of encroachment. Application (Exh.5) seeking temporary injunction against the petitioners-original defendants filed by respondent-original plaintiff was rejected on 29.09.2016 on the ground that the original plaintiff could not establish prima facie case in his favour and he could not prima facie show which property was in his possession. When the suit has been filed for injunction simplicitor, I do not understand as to how the Civil Judge, Junior Division could have passed order directing appointment of T.I.L.R., with direction to submit his factual report as regards possession and user of the land. This amounts to collection of evidence which is not the object of the provisions regarding appointment of the Court Commissioner, as contained in Order 26 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code. The learned Single Judge (As the Hon’ble Judge then) in the case of Sanjay Namdeo Khandare Vs. Sahebrao Kachru Khandare & Ors., 2001 (2) Mh.L.J.959 has also taken a view that appointing the Court Commissioner to su