S.C.GUPTE
Polypharma Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rangnath S. Iyer – Respondent
1. This writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges an order passed by the Labour Court at Mumbai in an industrial dispute application filed under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (“ID Act”).
2. The Petitioner is a private company limited by shares, engaged in the business of manufacture of laboratory chemicals and fine chemicals. It has factories at (i) Village Saravali, near Bhiwandi and (ii) Thane. Its head office is at Fort, Mumbai. The Respondent was employed at its head office as a secretary-cum-stenographer since 1986. On a reference made to it under the ID Act in 1982 on behalf of workmen at the Petitioner's factories at Saravali and Thane (Reference (ID) No.65 of 1982), the Industrial Tribunal at Bombay had passed an award in favour of some workmen employed at the Petitioner's factories inter alia directing the Petitioner to pay dearness allowance. In or about 2001, the Respondent filed an application under Section 33-C(2) of the ID Act before the 6th Labour Court at Mumbai claiming (a) special allowance declared by the Government from time to time between 1 January 1986 and 31 December 2000, (b) dearness all
The Manager, Hotel Imperial vs. The Chief Commissioner, Delhi
P. Virudhachalam vs. The Management of Lotus Mills
Greaves Cotton and Co. Ltd. vs. Workmen
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. vs. The Workmen
Chief Mining Engineer, East India Coal Co. Ltd. v. Rameshwar & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.