SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 47

A.S.CHANDURKAR
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ramilaben Wd/o Jayantilal Patel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. D.N. Kukday.
For the Respondent: Mr. G.E. Moharir.

JUDGMENT :

A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

1. The present appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “the said Act”) takes exception to the Award dated 13th February, 2004 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, in Claim Petition No. 844 of 2002.

2. In an accident that occurred on 22nd August, 1999, one Jayantilal, the husband of respondent no. 1 and father of respondent nos. 2 and 3 expired. Said accident occurred when Jayantilal was riding his two wheeler and was dashed by a truck. The said truck was insured with the appellant herein. The respondent nos. 1 to 3 filed claim petition under Section 166 of the said Act seeking compensation of Rs.19,42,748-00. This claim was opposed by the appellant. After the parties led evidence, learned Member of the Claims Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition and awarded compensation of Rs. 15,84,225-00. Hence this appeal.

3. Shri D.N. Kukday, learned counsel for the appellant, made two-fold submissions:

(a) The Claims Tribunal was not justified in taking into consideration the Income Tax Returns that were filed after the death of Jayantilal. It was submitted that the Claims Tribunal took into cons


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top