B.R.GAVAI, INDIRA JAIN
Mohd. Hanif s/o Mohd. Habib – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
B.R. Gavai, J.
1. The appellants by way of these two appeals have approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Akola dated 8.6.2016 in Sessions Trial Nos. 144/12 & 233/14, thereby convicting them for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148 and 324 read with Section 149 and Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. In so far as the offences under Sections 143 & 144 of the Indian Penal Code are concerned, the learned trial Judge has not given separate sentence for Section 143 and the accused have been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default to suffer further R.I. for two months. In so far as offences under Sections 147 & 148 are concerned, no separate punishment is imposed for Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused have been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years each and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default to suffer undergo R.I. for two months. In so far as the offences under Section 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code are concerned, the accused have been sentenced to suffer
Abdul Nawaz vs. State of West Bengal
Dharam Singh and others vs. State of Punjab
Dilawar Singh Vs. State of Delhi
Gopal Singh and another vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & another
Jagroop Singh vs. State of Punjab
Lakshmi Singh and others etc. .vs. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.