S.S. SHINDE, J.

1. Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties.

3. Brief facts leading for filing the petition are as under:

It is the case of the petitioners that the various litigations are pending between the petitioner no. 13 and respondent no. 3. The details of the said litigation, outcome of the said litigation and also the actions taken against respondent no. 3 for recovery of loan, has been extensively stated in the Writ Petition. The main grievance of the petitioners is that, (a) despite all these litigation mentioned in the Writ Petition and various orders passed by the authorities issuing certificates under Section 101, which has become final, (b) challenging the auction proceedings, which has become final, (c) challenging the fixation of upset price, which has become final, (d) challenging the granting of ‘R’ certificates under Section 100, which has also become final and (e) pendency of the Writ Petition No. 3512/2014 in the High Court, respondent no. 3 is so influential that, he made application to respondent no. 2 Deputy Commissioner of Police, Circle-2, Aurangabad City making certain allegations, and respond