SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 793

B.P.COLABAWALLA
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Digvijaysingh Gangasingh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants : Mr. Ajay Khaire with Mr. Ranjith Ramesh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Zubin Behram Kamdin with Ms. Jennifer Michael, M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Co.

JUDGMENT :

B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.

1. This Civil Revision Application filed under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short the “CPC”) takes exception to the judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2009 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court at Bombay in Appeal No. 70 of 2007. By this judgment and order, the order passed by the Trial Court decreeing the suit in favour of the Plaintiff landlord was confirmed and the Appeal was dismissed.

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present controversy are that the Applicant herein (the Defendant before the Trial Court) is a statutory Corporation formed and established under the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956. It is wholly owned by the Central Government. The Respondents are all trustees of Shri Lalsingh Mansingh Trust (for short, the “said Trust”) which is the owner of office premises admeasuring 4551.68 sq. ft. on the 3rd Floor, Above Block C and D of the building known as Harganga Mahal Estate situated at Khodadad Circle, Dadar, Mumbai 400 014 (hereinafter referred to as the “suit premises”).

3. The Defenda


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top