MRIDULA BHATKAR
Ravindra Narayan Rajarshi – Appellant
Versus
Rohini Ganpatrao Heblikar – Respondent
MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
1. In all these Civil Revision Applications, the order dated 26.3.2015 passed by the 16th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune, is challenged. The issue pertains to payment of Court fees under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act. The plaintiffs i.e. the respondents, have filed respective suits for specific performance, declaration and injunction. The land is owned by the original defendant Nos. 1 to 4 and the original defendant Nos. 5 to 16 have given consent for the same. So, different agreements were executed with original plaintiffs i.e. the respondents on 12.4.1991 and thereafter as the original defendants, the original landlords, did not act pursuant to the agreement, so the first purchasers i.e. the original plaintiffs, filed suits for specific performance. The original plaintiffs had knowledge that on 3.3.2005, the defendant Nos. 1 to 6 had entered into agreement with defendant No. 17 in respect of the sale of the said lands. Further, the sale deed dated 3.5.2007 was executed by defendant Nos. 1 to 6 and defendant No. 7 and defendant Nos. 19 to 36. Therefore, during pendency of the suit, subsequently, defendant Nos. 19 to 36 were added as party de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.