SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 856

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
V.M. DESHPANDE, J.
Chandrakumar Sundardas Taneja - Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 144 of 2001
Decided On : 06-07-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri Sahil S. Dewani
For the Respondents: Miss T.H. Udeshi

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 306 and 498-A-Evidence Act, 1872, Section 113-A- Conviction for abetment of suicide and cruelty.-In absence of any evidence to show any demand by accused from deceased-wife and that he harassed her in order to drive her to commit suicide, conviction of accused cannot be sustained.

       Re-appreciation of the entire prosecution case according to this Court shows that there were no allegations that this appellant made any demand from deceased. Deceased was not subject to cruelty for any such demand from the present appellant. Further, there is no evidence available on record by which it can be said that the appellant is guilty of committing that type of harassment to deceased which drives her to commit suicide. Therefore, the charge under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code is not at all proved against the appellant. In that view of the matter, presumption under Section 113-A of the Indian Evidence Act is not available to the prosecution.

       Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 113-A-Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 306 and 498-A- Presumption as to cruelty and abetment of suicide.-Unnatural death of a married woman within 7 years of her marriage by itself not sufficient to raise presumption under Section 113-A of Act.

       Merely because a married woman met unnatural death due to burn injuries that by itself is not sufficient to attract the presumption as envisaged under Section 113-A of the Evidence Act. In order to attract the said provision the prosecution is obliged to prove that the deceased was subjected to harassment to such an extent that she is driven to commit suicide. Then and then only the said presumption can be pressed into service.

JUDGMENT :

The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in S.T. No. 163/1996, by which the learned Judge of the Court below convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

In respect of conviction under Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code, the appellant was directed to suffer R.I. for 1 year and 6 months and was directed to pay fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer R.I. for 6 months.

So far as, his conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code is concerned appellant was directed to suffer R.I. for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs. 2000/- and in default of payment of fine he was ordered to suffer further R.I. for one year.

2. The prosecution case as it is unfolded during the course of trial, is as under:

Ashok Govindrao Kshirsagar (PW3) on 16/4/1996 was attached to P.S. Ramnagar at Chandrapur as a police constable. His duty hours were from 8.00 p.m. of 16/4/1996 to 8.00 a.m. of 17/4/1996. While he was discharging his duty at about 2.30 a.m. he received a message from Police Control Room informing him that fire has erupted at Sindhi Colony, Ramnagar. A direction was given to him to visit spot alongwith duty officer. Accordingly duty officer Shri Sheikh, this prosecution witness and other police staff reached to the spot. During the course of their travel from police station to Sindhi Colony, Ramnagar the factum of fire was informed to Fire Brigade and also to police sub-inspector. When this staff reached to the spot they noticed that fire brigade was already reached there and steps were being taken to extinguish fire. The fire broke in the house of present appellant and first upper floor of the house was engulfed with such fire. Fire Brigade extinguished the fire. The door of the room was chained from inside. It was broken up. When P.C. Ashok (PW3) alongwith other police staff entered the room they found dead body of woman in complete charred condition and was lying along side the cot. The dead body was identified as dead body of wife of appellant and she was identified as “Harsha”.

3. Gopal Hemchandra Rupani (PW1), the brother of deceased Harsha reached to police station. That time Mohd. Hanif Sk. Shabbir (PW9) was Police Sub-Inspector of P.S. Ramnagar. Gopal (PW1) lodged his report (Exh.24). The gist of the FIR lodged by first informant Gopal (PW1) is as under:

His sister whose maiden name was Maya Rupani was married on 01/04/1994 with applicant. After 34 months of her marriage appellant and his mother started causing illtreatment to her in respect of dowry. She was beaten, she was abused by her mother in law and the appellant. That because of the beatings at the hands of the appellant and the mental harassment on the part of her mother in law his deceased sister was suffering from tremendous mental stress causing blood omitting. Though the treatment was given to her by appellant, there was no improvement. Resultantly, she was taken to K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai. No person from the appellant side came to Mumbai. Thereafter first informant (PW1) and his sister came to Khamgaon, the parental city of deceased Harsha. On 29/2/1995 his other brother in law alognwith his sister dropped Harsha to her matrimonial house at Chandrapur. The F.I.R. further recites that thereafter again ill-treatment started causing again blood omitting. The fact of blood omitting was informed by the appellant therefore, first informant came to Chandrapur and took his sister to Khamgaon where she was administered some Ayurvedic medicines with treatment. That treatment was continued about 2 and ½ months at Khamgaon. Thereafter, as per request made by deceased she was taken to Chandrapur. It is stated in the F.I.R. that, that time appellant and mother in law of deceased did not allow her to enter into the house unless she gave in writing. Subsequently, again the deceased was brought to Khamgaon and








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top