SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1080

A.S.OKA, ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
Lavina Martin – Appellant
Versus
Sam Bosco Martin – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, J.

The Appellant wife has by this application challenged the judgment and decree dated 17th July, 2008 whereby the 7th Family Court, Mumbai allowed the Petition under section 10(x) and 10(ix) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 filed by the Respondent-husband and dissolved the marriage solemnised between them.

2. The brief facts necessary to decide this Appeal are as under: The marriage between the Appellant-wife and the Respondent-husband was solemnised on 2.1.1988 at St. Joseph Church, Umarkhadi, Mumbai as per Christian Rules and rituals. On 19.6.1989, a son was born in the wedlock. On 12th October, 2006 the Respondent husband filed a petition under section 10(x) and 10(ix) of the Divorce Act, 1869 for a decree of divorce.

3. The Respondent-husband claimed that the Appellant-wife had agreed to stop working in shifts and instead work during regular office hours. However, after marriage she refused to alter her work schedule. The Respondent-husband claimed that the Petitioner-wife was frigid and psychologically impotent. The Respondent-husband further claimed that the Appellant-wife had given in writing that she did not have any objections if he had affa

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top