V.K. Jadhav, J.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for respective parties, heard finally.

2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the common Judgment and order passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 91 of 2014 and Criminal Revision Application No.92 of 2014 by the learned Sessions Judge, Nanded dated 13.2.2015, the original accused in Sessions Case No.208 of 2013 has preferred these writ petitions.

3. Brief facts, giving rise to the present writ petitions, are as follows :

(a) On the basis of the complaint lodged by Respondent No.2 Priya Waghmare Crime bearing No.10/2012 came to be registered at Police Station, Bhagyanagar, District Nanded for the offence punishable under section 498A, 497, 328, 294, 292, 323, 504, 506, 509, 114, 109 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After due investigation, Police Station Bhagya Nagar has submitted charge sheet in the Court and the case is committed to the Sessions Court as offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners/accused are triable exclusively by the Court of Sessions.

(b) The petitioners have filed an application Exh.55 in the said Sessions Case 208 of 2013 for disch