A.S.OKA, P.D.NAIK
Tanaji @ Tillya Dinkar Walgude – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
P.D. Naik, J.
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Learned APP for the State and learned Advocate for the Respondent no. 2 waive service.
2. The Applicants have preferred this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Code') and sought quashing of the proceedings in RCC No. 3212 of 2015. The said proceedings are arising out of CR No. 32 of 2014 registered with Velha Police Station, Pune Rural. The Second Respondent is the first informant who had lodged the first information report (`FIR') for the offences punishable under Sections 386, 387, 447, 506, 109 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (`IPC'). On the basis of the registration of FIR, investigation was completed by the Police and charge sheet has been filed before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune.
3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows :
(a) The Complainant-Respondent no. 2 herein left his house for work. His wife was alone at home. When he returned home for lunch, he was informed by his wife that at about 9.30 a.m; the Applicant no. 1 had visited the house and was inquiring about the whereabouts of the complainant. The Applicant no. 1 had further s
Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal
Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Limited
Jitendra Raghuvanshi v. Babita Raghuvanshi
Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Golconda Linga Swamy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.