SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1184

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.S. SHINDE, K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
Chayabai w/o. Sahebrao Hiwale and others - Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.- Respondents
Criminal Application No. 1465 of 2017
Decided on : 05-05-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicants :Mr. Deepak K. Rajput, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. D.R. Kale, A.P.P, Mr. R.M. Deshmukh, Advocate

At the stage of investigation, the court cannot quash proceedings before the trial, and the facts alleged would have to be proved in a regular trial.

Headnote:

498A - Domestic Violence - Indian Penal Code, Section 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 3 and 4 - The court discussed the allegations of ill-treatment, harassment, and demand for dowry against the accused. The court also referred to relevant legal provisions and previous judgments to determine that the allegations disclosed the offenses and required further investigation.

Fact of the Case:

The respondent lodged a first information report against the applicants, alleging ill-treatment, harassment, and demand for dowry. The applicants sought to quash the report, claiming the allegations were false and made with the intention to harass them.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the allegations in the first information report disclosed the offenses and required further investigation. The court also noted that the disputed questions of facts would be adjudicated in a trial and that quashing the proceedings before the trial was not permissible.

Issues: The issues revolved around the veracity of the allegations in the first information report, the demand for dowry, ill-treatment, and harassment, and whether the offenses were disclosed and required further investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that at the stage of investigation, it cannot be said that no case is made out, and quashing of proceedings before the trial is not permissible. The court also emphasized that the facts alleged would have to be proved in a regular trial.

Final Decision: The court rejected the application for quashing the first information report, stating that the observations made were prima facie in nature and did not preclude the applicants from availing an appropriate remedy in the event of filing a charge sheet by the Investigating Officer.

JUDGMENT :

S.S. Shinde, J.

1. This application is filed with the following prayer :

"B) The first information report No. 0005/2017 dated 17.01.2017 registered with Ghansavangi Police Station, Ghansavangi, Dist. Jalna for the offence punishable U/S. 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act may please be quashed and set aside in the interest of justice and to prevent abuse of process of law."

2. The brief facts leading to file the present application are as under :

Applicant no.1 is the mother of Sanjog Hiwale i.e. the husband of respondent no.2. Applicant Nos. 2 to 4 are the bothers of husband of respondent no.2. The marriage of Sanjog and Aarchanabai has taken place on 25th November, 2007. They are having a son namely 'Shourya' from their wedlock. The husband of respondent no.2 doing business and also running Internet Cafe in Nutan Vasahat, Jalna and residing near to the business place since 2013. Since their marriage respondent no.2 and her husband are residing separately and the applicants used to meet them very occasionally.

3. The complainant/respondent No.2 lodged first information report No. 0005/2017 with Ghansavangi Police Station, Ghansavangi, Dist. Jalna for the offence punishable U/S. 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on 17th January, 2017 against the present applicants alleging that, she married to Sanjog on 25th January, 2007. After marriage she came to Jalna for cohabitation with her husband and her inlaws treated her well for three months and thereafter they started suspecting her character and used to beat and tease her. They were asking to bring Rs.2 lacs from her parents and the said fact was informed to her father. He came to the house of the applicants at Jalna and requested them not to harass his daughter. Thereafter, she resided with them for seven years. During her wedlock, she gave birth to a child namely 'Shourya'. The applicants driven her out of the house as their demand of Rs.2 Lacs was not fulfilled by her parents. Thereafter, she went with her father at Masegaon and is residing at her father's home. Respondent no.2 also made complaint with the Women's Protection Cell, where her husband came alone and therefore the settlement could not take place. Thereafter she got letter from Women's Protection Cell and lodged this Complaint. Hence this application.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that, the allegations in the first information report are taken at its face value and read in its entirety, the ingredients of the alleged offences have not been disclosed against the present applicants. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that, when respondent no.2 made complaint to the Women's Protection Cell, she made different allegations in said complaint, than made in the first information report. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that, applicant nos. 2 and 3 are in Government service and applicant no.4 is in service of private undertaking and now he is in Germany for work in Multinational Company. He submits that, she lodged the first information report against all the accused/applicants only with an intention to harass them. He submits that, all the applicants are residing separately since the marriage of respondent no.2. Respondent No.2 and her husband Sanjog are residing at Nutan Colony, Behind Visava School, Old Jalna and there were clashes in between them on trifle matters. Therefore, respondent no.2 had earlier lodged complaint against her husband with the Kadim Police Station, Jalna on 1st June, 2016 for the offence punishable under sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that, applicant No. 1 is an old aged lady and she is residing at village Nandapur, Tq. and Dist. Jalna for doing the agricultural operations and she is suffering from various ailments due to old age. He submits th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top