SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Bom) 2113

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
V.L. Achliya, J.
Deelip S/o Kishan Jadhav and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 348 of 2002
Decided On : 27-10-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. S.S. Pawar
For the Respondent: Mr. A.V. Deshmukh

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 323, 429 and 504-Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3- Conviction for voluntarily causing hurt.-Since evidence of injured victim and complainant is contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence hence conviction of accused not sustainable.

       Therefore, taking into consideration the overall evidence that the prosecution has failed to prove the guilt against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The accused being the Police Patil and Sarpanch of the village, the possibility of they being falsely implicated in the false case cannot be ruled out in the light of the evidence on record. In this view, the accused deserve to be given benefit of doubt.

JUDGMENT :

V.L. Achliya, J.

Being aggrieved by the Judgment & Order dated 27/6/2002 passed by First Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Latur convicting the appellants for offence u/s 323, 504, 429 r/w 34 of the IPC, the appellants have preferred this appeal.

2. Before appreciating the submissions advanced, it is necessary to consider few facts leading to prosecution of the appellants/accused. The appellants were prosecuted for committing offence punishable u/s 323, 504, 429 r/w 34 of the IPC and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (herein after referred to as "Atrocities Act") with an allegation, that on 04.09.1999 at about 11:00 hrs., near bus stand of village Kumtha, the appellants acting in furtherance of their common intention voluntarily caused hurt to Shridhar Shinde (PW4), the husband of complainant Gangaubai Shinde (PW1) and also insulted the complainant and her husband and thereby committed offence u/s 323, 504 r/w 34 of the IPC and in the course of commission of said act, also committed the act of mischief by killing a monkey of the complainant by assaulting him by means of stick and thereby committed an offence u/s 429 r/w 34 of the IPC. Besides prosecuting them for committing offences under the Penal Code, the appellants were also prosecuted for the act to intentionally humiliate the complainant, who belongs to Mang community, in public view and thereby committed offence u/s 3(i)(x) of the Atrocities Act.

3. As per the case of the prosecution, Gangaubai (PW1) and her husband Shridhar (PW4) were resident of village Kumtha and they used to earn livelihood by showing the play of monkey. On 04.09.1999, the complainant along with her husband were proceeding from western Kumtha towards eastern Kumtha. When they came near ST stand, the accused Nos. 1 & 2 and other villagers told them to show the play of monkey. At that time, the husband of the complainant told them that as he was already late and he had to reach Killari by road, he is unable to show them play of monkey. At that time, accused Nos. 1 and 2 pressed the monkey by means of stick. Because of said act of accused Nos. 1 and 2, the monkey got annoyed and he rushed towards Hanmant Jagtap, torn his clothes & started shouting. The accused No. 2 dealt a blow of stick over the head of monkey. On receiving the blow, the monkey died on the spot. The accused No. 1 dealt blows of stick over the head, waist, back and right ear of Shridhar. The accused No. 2 assaulted Shridhar, the husband of complainant by means of stick and also abused the complainant and her husband. Gangubai (PW1) lodged the complaint in respect of the incident. On the basis of the complaint lodged, the offence u/s 323, 429, 504 r/w 34 of the IPC came to be registered vide C.R. No. 247/99 with Police Station Killari. PW3 (Subhash) registered the offence & referred Shridhar (PW4), the husband of the complainant Gangubai to Rural Hospital. The dead body of the monkey which was brought to Police Station by complainant was referred to Veterinary Hospital at Killari to conduct the postmortem on the dead body of the deceased monkey. During the course of investigation, the offence u/s 3(i)(x) of the Atrocities Act was added on the basis of supplementary statement of Gangubai (PW1) recorded on 09.09.1999. PSI Surendra Gandam (PW7) conducted the further investigation. During the investigation, statement of Abhimanyu Kamble (PW5), who alleged to have witnessed the incident, was recorded by the Investigating Officer. On conclusion of the investigation, the charge-sheet was prepared and filed in the court of JMFC, Ausa. Since the offence u/s 3(i)(x) of the Atrocities Act, being triable by Special Court, the case was transferred to the file of Special Judge, Latur. The charge u/s 323, 504, 429 of the IPC and 3(i)(x) of the Atrocities Act framed against the accused. Both of them pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. In order to prove its case, the prosecution




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top