2015 Supreme(Bom) 2614
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.
Mahadeo Sandipan Kadam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 636 of 1994
Decided On : 26-11-2015
For the Appellant : Mr. Dilip Bodake.
For the Respondent: Ms. A.A. Mane.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the conviction of the appellant under Section 498-A of IPC for ill-treatment and harassment of his wife, leading to her suicide, and the imposition of a fine of Rs. 25,000.
Headnote:
Ill-treatment - Indian Penal Code - Sections 498-A, 306 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the evidence and upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. The court acquitted the appellant of the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC. The appellant was sentenced to undergo the substantive sentence for the period already undergone and was also liable to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 of Indian Penal Code for ill-treatment and harassment of his wife, leading to her suicide. The deceased was subjected to harassment, ill-treatment, and cruelty in her matrimonial house. She had attempted to commit suicide on multiple occasions and ultimately died in the matrimonial house.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 498-A of IPC but acquitted him of the offence punishable under Section 306. The appellant was sentenced to the substantive sentence for the period already undergone and was also liable to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000.
Issues: The main issue was the ill-treatment and harassment of the deceased by the appellant, leading to her suicide, and the subsequent conviction of the appellant under Sections 498-A and 306 of IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the evidence proved the ill-treatment and harassment of the deceased, leading to her suicide, and upheld the conviction under Section 498-A of IPC. However, the court acquitted the appellant of the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC.
Final Decision: The appellant was acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC. The conviction under Section 498-A of IPC was upheld, and the appellant was sentenced to the substantive sentence for the period already undergone and was also liable to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000.
Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.
1. Heard.
2. The appellant herein is original accused No. 1 in Sessions Case No. 174 of 1994. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Solapur vide judgment and order dated 9.12.1994 has convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year and five years respectively. Hence, this appeal.
3. Such of the facts necessary for the decision of this appeal are as under:-
On 24.5.1994, Bhibhishan Ramling Mukhe, resident of Nimgaon, lodged a report at Kurduwadi Police Station, alleging therein that his sister Kusum was married to the present appellant five years prior to 24.5.1994. That at the time of marriage, Rs. 15,000/- was paid to the appellant as dowry. Half tola of golden ring was given and the complainant's parents had also given other domestic utensils. That one year after the marriage, his sister was being ill-treated on the ground that the utensils given at the time of marriage were of low quality. There was demand of money for laying down the pipeline. She was harassed and ill-treated. She was abused, assaulted and similarly she was also being ill-treated on the ground that she had a squint in her eye. She was being taunted as blind. That three years prior to 24.5.1994, his sister Kusum had jumped into the well as she could not take the ill-treatment any more. She was able to swim and, therefore, she did not get drowned. She reported to her maternal house. Her parents had informed about it to the relatives. The complainant had then taken his sister Kusum to her matrimonial house and had requested them to take care of his sister. That for a period of three years, she had not conceived pregnancy and therefore she was being taunted on the said ground as being a barren woman. She was made to starve. She was assaulted on trifling ground. Two years thereafter, she became intolerant with all the cruelty meted out to her and had therefore consumed poison. She was admitted in the hospital of Dr. Wagle. At that time, she had informed the police that pesticides was being sprayed on the agricultural crops and she has inhaled it. Thereafter, Sandipan brought her home. She resided in her maternal house for a period of 5-6 months. The appellant had sent three notices to her. She had not accepted the said notices. Thereafter, there was mediation and she was sent to her matrimonial house on the assurance that she would be treated well. His second sister Rekha was to get married. At that time, the appellant was gifted with 5 gram of a golden ring. On 12.5.1994, the elder brother of the complainant was to get married and, therefore, the members of the family of the appellant were invited. They were honoured by giving gifts. The appellant had insisted that they should gift him a golden ring. On denial, he insisted upon Kusum to return to the matrimonial house along with him forthwith. She refused to accompany him. He had threatened her of dire consequences. 8 days after the marriage, the complainant had brought Kusum to her matrimonial house. Two days prior to 23.5.1994, she had been to the hospital of Dr. Shah for treatment. The paternal uncle of the complainant i.e. Nivrutti had met her at Madha. She had informed him that she had colic pain. In spite of it the members of the matrimonial family were asking her to do hard work. She had also informed that she was made to lift stones. She insisted upon Nivrutti to take her to the maternal house. The appellant had refused to send her to her maternal house. On 23.5.1994, Ashok Patil had informed the complainant that his sister Kusum has died in the hospital. The reason of death was not disclosed to the complainant. All the relatives had been to the hospital. After performing the postmortem, funeral was performed opinion her and thereafter he had lodged the report at the police station. On the basis of his report, Crime No. 25 of 1994 was registered against the accused for the offences puni