B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, ARUN D.UPADHYE
Prabhakar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary Department of Law and Judiciary Mantralaya – Respondent
Arun D. Upadhye, J.
1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The public interest litigation is heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has filed this public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and prayed following reliefs:
“(i) To entertain this petition as Public Interest Litigation. (ii) Quash and set aside the notifications dated 23/03/2016, 03/05/2016 and 10/05/2016 (Annexure-N) issued by the respondent no.1.
(ii) Direct the respondent No.1 to cancel the appointments of the respondent No.4 to 12.”
3. The present writ petition is registered as Public Interest Litigation. The petitioner is a citizen of India and resident of Katlabodi, Tah. Korpana, District Chandrapur. He claims to be social worker and has no any personal interest in the subject matter of the petition.
4. Respondent no.1 is State of Maharashtra and respondent no.3 is Collector and District Magistrate, Chandrapur. Respondent nos.5 to 12 are appointed as District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor and Assistant Go
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi and others Vs. State of U.P. and others
Mahadeo Ramkisan Andhale Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Neelima Sadanand Vartak Vs. State of Maharashtra and others
State of U.P. and another Vs. Johri Mal
State of Uttar Pradesh and others Vs. Ajay Kumar Sharma and another
State of Punjab and another Vs. Brijeshwar Singh Chahal and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.