SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1524

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
SWAPNA JOSHI, J.
Houslal Lakhanlal Macchrike – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 745 of 2003
Decided On : 22-09-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.G. Karmarkar, Counsel
For the Respondent: Shamsi Haider, Additional Public Prosecutor

Headnote:

Cruelty - Abetment of Suicide - IPC 306, IPC 498A - Section 113A of the Evidence Act - [306, 498A, 113A] - The court discussed the provisions of IPC 306 and IPC 498A, along with Section 113A of the Evidence Act, and highlighted the elements of abetment of suicide, the presumption of abetment of suicide by a married woman, and the definition of cruelty under IPC 498A. The court emphasized the sustained incitement for suicide and the presumption of abetment of suicide by a married woman subjected to cruelty by her husband or relatives.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased, Komalwati, was subjected to harassment and demands for dowry by the accused, leading to her suicide and the death of her two daughters. The prosecution heavily relied on the testimony of witnesses to establish the accused's responsibility for the suicidal deaths.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the accused had harassed the deceased for dowry and subjected her to cruelty, leading to her suicide and the death of her daughters. The court upheld the conviction of the accused under IPC 306 and IPC 498A.

Issues: The issues revolved around the harassment and demands for dowry by the accused, the abetment of suicide, and the presumption of abetment of suicide by a married woman subjected to cruelty.

Ratio Decidendi: The sustained incitement for suicide, the presumption of abetment of suicide by a married woman subjected to cruelty, and the definition of cruelty under IPC 498A were the key legal principles applied by the court.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction of the accused under IPC 306 and IPC 498A was upheld. The accused was directed to surrender to undergo the remaining period of the sentence.

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant (hereinafter will be referred as ‘the accused’) against the judgment and order passed by the learned Ist Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gondiya in Sessions Trial No.72 of 2001 on 25-11-2003, whereby the learned trial Judge had convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for three months.

2. The learned trial Judge further convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.

3. I have heard Mr. S.G. Karmarkar, the learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Shamsi Haider, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. With their assistance, I have carefully gone through the record of the prosecution case.

4. The facts in brief are as under:

Komalwati (deceased) married to the accused on 30-04-1998 at Bordi, District Balaghat (MP). After marriage, Komalwati started residing with the joint family of accused at Latori, Tahsil Salekasa, District Gondiya. It is the case of the prosecution that, at the time of marriage, the father of deceased Komalwati presented her necessary household articles and performed the marriage as per his financial status. For about one year, there were no complaints from Komalwati. However, after about one year of marriage, the accused started demanding Sofa and Bed. Accordingly, PW2 presented those articles to him. The accused then demanded motorcycle, however, the father of Komalwati could not fulfill his demand. On 03-11-2000, Komalwati delivered first female baby by name Jidyasa. It is alleged that, the accused was insisting Komalwati to bring motorcycle, furniture, ornaments and the amount of Rs. 10,000/- and for that demand the accused used to harass her. During Raksha Bandhan festival of 2001, Komalwati visited her parental house at Bordi and disclosed the ill-treatment meted out by the accused. At that time, she was carrying second pregnancy. Komalwati resided with her parents till Ganesh festival. Komalwati was not ready to return her matrimonial house. However, her father reached her to Latori and paid the amount of Rs. 10,000/- to the accused. On 07-10-2001, Komalwati delivered a second female child at Latori. It caused much displeasure in the family of the accused and they were disappointed due to the birth of second female child and so also their demands were not fulfilled. It is alleged that the accused started harassing Komalwati. Komalwati could not tolerate the said harassment and on 30-10-2001 at about 5.30 to 6 o'clock in the early morning, she killed her both the daughters by administrating Endosulfan insecticide and committed suicide by consuming the said poison.

5. PW1-Gendlal, the Police Patil, immediately informed about the said incident to Police Station Salekasa and lodged the report (Exhibit-55). The Police rushed to the place of incident and conducted the spot panchanama (Exhibit-69). The traces of vomitus were collected from the spot (Exhibit-70). During the course of investigation it was observed that, Komalwati had confined herself in a room and in order to prevent the entry of others, she had placed obstacle of heavy weight besides the door of the room. When the villagers entered inside the room, both the daughters and Komalwati were found struggling for life. Prior to shifting them to hospital, Komalwati died on the spot, whereas her both the daughters died in Primary Health Centre, Salekasa.

6. The Police conducted the inquest panchanama (Exhibit-67). The dead bodies of Komalwati and her two daughters were sent for post mortem (Exhibit-74). The PM report reveals the cause of death as cardio respiratory arrest due to Organ Phosphorus poison.

7. On 01-11




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top