1. Criminal Appeal No.975 of 2015 is by the appellant who was accused no.1 before the learned trial court where as Criminal Appeal No. 386 of 2012 is by the appellant who was original accused no.3 before the learned trial court. It is seen that, though Sessions case bearing No.573 of 2010 arising out of Crime No.92 of 2010 registered against these appellants and other co-accused was heard by the learned trial court, at the stage of recording statement under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the appellant/accused no.1 Ramesh Bhosale absconded, and therefore, initially said Sessions case bearing no.573 of 2010 came to be decided on 24th January 2012 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, by separating trial of appellant/accused no.1 Ramesh Bhosale. While deciding the said sessions case on 24th January 2012, the appellant/ accused no.3 Anand Raimokar came to be convicted of the offence punishable under Section 411 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3 years apart from direction to pay fine of Rs.6,000/- and in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for 3 months. Hence, this appeal bearing no.386 of