SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1375

ROHIT B.DEO
Dattatraya – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Prafulla S. Khubalkar
For the Respondent: N.B. Jawade

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellant is challenging the judgment and order dated 18.12.2001 delivered by Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case 25/1991, by and under which, the appellant is convicted of offences punishable under sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/- for offence under section 7 and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/- for offence punishable under section 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Act.

2. The prosecution case is that the accused was working as an Accounts Officer and at the relevant time was attached to the office of Superintending Engineer, 400 K.V. Transmission Lines, Construction Circle, Nagpur. The complainant Padgilwar lodged a complaint with the Anti Corruption Bureau, Nagpur (A.C.B.) at 10:05 hrs. on 23.07.1990. The gist of the complaint is that the complainant is a contractor and two bills in respect of the work of Pandharkawada and Wani were pending with the then Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E.B.). The bill of work of Wani was a
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top