RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Sayali Roshan Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
1. After considering the strenuous submissions of the learned Advocate for the Petitioner and the learned AGP on behalf of Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3, I had observed in my order dated 24.08.2017 in paragraphs 2 to 12 as under:
"2. The election program for the election to the Jalgaon District Planning Committee has been published on 05/08/2017. The nomination papers have been scrutinized from 16/08/2017 and 18/08/2017 was the day for publication of the list of valid nominations.
3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of her nomination paper by the District Collector of Jalgaon which was earlier accepted by the Returning Officer.
4. As per the election program, the elections were to be held for two constituencies, namely, Rural Area Constituency and Small Urban Area Constituency. In so far as the reserved post for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe in the said election is concerned, Rule 16 (3) Maharashtra District Planning Committee (Election) Rules, 1999 framed under of the Maharashtra District Planning Committee (Constitution and Functions) Act, 1998, require a certificate from the authority certifying that the candidate is elected to the respective body against th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.