SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1388

SWAPNA JOSHI
Union of India, through Railway Protection Force, Akola – Appellant
Versus
Mohomad Harun – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : C.J. Dhumane
For the Respondent: H.R. Gadhia

JUDGMENT :

1. The present appeal has been preferred by the Union of India against the judgment and order dated 17-08-2000 delivered in Regular Criminal Case No.44 of 1995 by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways), Bhusawal, whereby the learned Judge acquitted the respondent/accused under Section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred as, ’the RPUP Act’ for the sake of brevity).

2. Heard Mr. Dhumane, the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant/Union of India and Mr. H.R. Gadhia, the learned Counsel for the respondent. I have carefully gone through the record of the case and the impugned judgment and order.

3. The complainant's version, as unfolded during the trial, is as follows:

Complainant Dattatrya Agarkar (PW-1) was on patrolling duty as a Head Constable at about 8.00 hours to 16.00 hours on 05-02-1995 at Shegaon Railway Yard. At about 11.30 hours, he saw the accused carrying some heavy material on his shoulder, at the side of ‘B’ Cabin. PW-1 caught hold the accused while he was crossing the railway line which is by the side of cabin. On carrying out the inspection of the material, which was on the shoulder of the accuse






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top