1. The State of Maharashtra, being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge,Akola in Criminal Revision No.91/2011 is before this Court.

2. Heard learned A.P.P. for applicant-State and learned counsel for non-applicant-original accused.

3. By the impugned judgment learned Additional Sessions Judge,Akola not only allowed the revision filed on behalf of the non-applicant-accused before it but also stopped the proceeding of S.C.C.No.803/2009 under Section 258 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

4. The few facts to be narrated for deciding the present case are as under:

The victim lodged a report with P.S.Civil Lines, Akola on 21/8/2005 alleging therein that the non-applicant herein on telephone asked her to keep illicit physical relations with him for a night for the favourable consideration of candidature of her son for his appointment in the police department. The non-applicant herein at the relevant time was working as Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Sub-Division, Akola. The complaint was lodged by the victim on 21/8/2005 and since it disclosed commission of cognizable offence an offence under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code was registered