1. Challenge in this petition is to impugned order dated 24th July, 2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge 5, Nagpur, whereby appeal preferred by respondent against the order passed by learned trial Court granting monetary reliefs under Section 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “Act of 2005”) to petitioner of Rs.2000/- per month and to her sons Rs.1000/- each, respectively, and also granting compensation of Rs.5000/- under Section 22 of the Act of 2005, was partly allowed thereby rejecting amount of maintenance granted to petitioner – wife, and confirming order of maintenance granted to her children, who were original applicant nos.2 and 3. It is the case of petitioner that the learned Appellate Court did not consider evidence on record in its proper perspective and wrongly came to the conclusion that the petitioner is not entitled for maintenance granted by the learned trial Court. It is contended that in fact evidence of petitioner remained unconverted and in fact respondent did not bring on record any evidence before the learned trial Court establishing that he was not in any manner liable for payment o