V.M.DESHPANDE
Madhusudan Vishwanath Mule – Appellant
Versus
Gajanan Vishwanath Mule – Respondent
1. The present appeal is filed against judgment and decree passed by learned Civil Judge Junior Division at Malkapur dated 23.4.1998 in Regular Civil Suit No.44 of 1995 which was confirmed by learned Ad hoc Additional District Judge at Buldana on 13.3.2003 in Regular Civil Appeal No.67 of 1998.
2. By these two judgments and decrees, both the Courts below dismissed the suit for partition, possession, declaration, and mesne profit filed by the present appellant.
3. According to the plaint, the plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 to 4 are real and stepbrothers and sisters.
The plaintiff being in service as a Talathi in Revenue Department was not residing in ancestral village Rohinkhed during his service period. He took voluntary retirement and, thereafter, started demanding his share in the property. The suit was restricted for the following properties:
(i) two storeyed house at village Rohinkhed, Taluka Motala, District Buldana;
(ii) an open land admeasuring 20'x20' feet adjacent to the house.
According to the plaint, these properties were ancestral properties and remained to be partitioned. In the plaint itself, it is averred that ancestral agricultural property at village Rohinkhed w
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani and anr vs. Indusind Bank Ltd. and ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.