IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AT NAGPUR BENCH
R.K. DESHPANDE, M.G. GIRATKAR, JJ.
Gajanan - Petitioner
Versus
The Head Master, Govt. Ashram School & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 3308 of 2013
Decided On : 08-11-2017
Scheduled Tribe - Mana - Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act No.63 of 1956, and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976. The court also referenced the decisions in Jaywant Dilip Pawar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., Dina v. Narayan Singh, State of Maharashtra v. Milind and others, Mana Adim Jamat Mandal v. State of Maharashtra and others, E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors., and Anand v. Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims and others.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's claim for 'Mana' (Scheduled Tribe Category) was invalidated by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, leading to the cancellation of the petitioner's certificate. The petitioner produced documents showing his caste as 'Mana', but the Committee rejected the claim based on historical and community affiliation grounds.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's claim for 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe was valid and that the Committee erred in rejecting the claim based on historical and community affiliation grounds. The court emphasized that the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950, and subsequent amendments, as well as relevant case law, supported the petitioner's claim.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the validity of the petitioner's claim for 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe, the interpretation of historical and community affiliation requirements, and the application of relevant legal provisions and case law.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950, and subsequent amendments, as well as the application of relevant case law, which emphasized that the petitioner's claim for 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe was valid and should not have been rejected by the Committee.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee and directed the Committee to issue a validity certificate in the name of the petitioner showing him as belonging to 'Mana', Scheduled Tribe, within a specified period.
R.K. Deshpande, J.
1. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 2-3-2013 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Gadchiroli, Division Nagpur, invalidating the claim of the petitioner for 'Mana' (Scheduled Tribe Category) and consequently canceling and confiscating the certificate dated 28-4-2011 issued in the name of the petitioner as belonging to 'Mana', Scheduled Tribe, which is an Entry No.18 in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.
2. Before the Committee, the petitioner produced about six documents, which all record the caste of the petitioner and his blood relatives as 'Mana'. The oldest document is the revenue record of the year 1-9-1920 in the name of Patralya Bijya, the real grandfather of the petitioner. The another document is the school leaving certificate in the name of the father of the petitioner, in which an entry 'Mana' was made on 1-4-1946 at the time of admission in the school. The petitioner produced the caste validity certificate dated 19-10-2005 in the name of Ramesh Sabalu, the cousin brother of the petitioner, and the another validity certificate dated 25-11-2010 in the name of Giraja Kawadu, the cousin sister of the petitioner, issued by the same Committee certifying their claim for 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe. The Police Vigilance Cell of the Committee also conducted an enquiry and concluded that the documents produced by the petitioner show his caste as 'Mana'.
3. The Committee records the finding that the entries in the school and revenue records of the blood relatives of the petitioner for the period from 1-9-1920 to 1946 consistently records the caste 'Mana'. However, all such documents are rejected mainly on the following findings :
(a) that 'Mana' community was included in the list of Scheduled Tribes in relation to the State of Maharashtra for the first time in the year 1960, that too in the specified area only, and the petitioner has failed to establish that he or his forefathers hail from the said area and migrated to the present place of their residence, from the said specified scheduled area.
(b) that in the year 1967, 'Mana' community was included in the list of Other Backward Classes at Serial No.268 and later on in the list of Special Backward Classes at Serial No.2 in relation to the State of Maharashtra,
(c) that there are nontribal communities like 'Badwaik Mana', 'Khand Mana', 'Kshatriya Mana', 'Kunbi Mana', 'Maratha Mana', 'Gond Mana', 'Mani'/'Mane', etc., and the petitioner has failed to satisfy crucial affinity test to establish that he belongs to 'Mana, Scheduled Tribe', which is an entry at Serial No.18 in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.
(d) that the documents produced simply indicate the caste as 'Mana' and not 'Mana, Scheduled Tribe'.
4. The President issued the Constitutional (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 in exercise of the power conferred by clause (2) of Article 342 of the Constitution of India. By clause 2 of that Order, it was provided that the tribes or tribal communities, or parts of, or groups within, tribes or tribal communities, specified in Parts I to XXII of the Scheduled to the Order shall, in relation to the States to which those Parts respective relate, be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes so far as regards members thereof residents in the localities specified in relation to them respectively in those Parts of that Schedule.
5. Initially, Entry No.12 in the relevant Part in the Schedule to the Order read as “Gond, including Madia (Maria) and Mudia (Muria)”. By the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act No.63 of 1956, the said Entry No.12 was substituted by Entry No.12 in paragraph 7 of Part VIII(A) of the Schedule to the Order, which was as follows:
“7. In (1) Melghat tahsil of the Amravati district.
(2) Gadchiroli and Sironcha tahsils of the Chanda district.
(3) Kelapur, Wani and Yeotmal tasils of the Yeotmal district:
12. Gond, including – Arakh or Arrakh, Agaria, Asur, Badi Maria or Bada
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.