SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1688

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.S. SHINDE, MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
Shaikh Iftekhar s/o Abdul Rauf and Others – Petitioners
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others – Respondents
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.610 OF 2017
Decided On : 24-11-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.S. Bharuka Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Shashibhushan P. Deshmukh, A.P.P.

Confiscation of goods is permissible only if the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act are violated, and the validity of seizure should be determined based on the evidence and relevant legal provisions.

Headnote:

Public Distribution System - Quashing of Charge-sheet - Sections 6[4], 9 of Public Distribution System [Control] Order, 2001 and Sections 3, 7 of Essential Commodities Act

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were charged for offenses under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 and Essential Commodities Act for transporting rice, alleged to be from the public distribution system. The petitioners contended that the seized rice was not from the public distribution system and provided evidence to support their claim.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the seized rice was validly purchased by the petitioner and was not from the public distribution system. The court also noted that the Tahsildar verified the stock and confirmed that the seized rice was not from government godowns or fair price shops. The court concluded that the continuation of proceedings against the petitioners would be an abuse of process of law and ordered the quashing of the charge-sheet.

Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of the seizure of rice from the petitioners and whether the seized rice was from the public distribution system.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Essential Commodities Act, emphasizing that confiscation of goods is permissible only if the provisions of the Act are violated. The court also considered the provisions of the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 and the evidence provided by the petitioners to determine the validity of the seizure.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the charge-sheet was quashed, with the court finding that the seized rice was not from the public distribution system.

JUDGMENT :

S.S. SHINDE, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. This Writ Petition is filed with following substantive prayer:

"(B) The Charge-sheet bearing R.C.C. No.22/2017 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chalisgaon in respect of Crime No.3054/2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 6[4] and Section 9 of the Public Distribution System [Control] Order, 2001 and under Sections 3 and 7 of Essential Commodities Act, may kindly be quashed and set aside."

3. The background facts for filing the present Petition as disclosed in the memo of the Petition, in brief, are as under:

(A). It is the case of the Petitioners that Petitioner No.1 is running a business in food articles by obtaining Food Licence issued by Licensing Authority for sale of Wheat, Jawar, Rice, Maize etc and licence is renewed upto the year 2019. One Shri Poonamchand Jaganlal Agrawal had purchased wheat, rice GRA and rice common by tender from Food Corporation of India, Nagpur, which is Government undertaking. Poonamchand Agrawal stored wheat and rice in his shop and godown at Kannad and accordingly informed Tahsildar, Kannad by letter dated 16th May, 2016. It is the further case of the Petitioners that Petitioner No.1 has purchased rice common of F.C.I. Tender weighing 160 Quintal 40 Kilogram vide bill No.187 dated 22nd May, 2016 from Poonamchand Agrawal and also purchased rice common of F.C.I. Tender weighing 200 Quintal vide bill No.188 dated 22nd May, 2016. The Petitioners have placed on record the copies of said bills.

(B) It is the further case of the Petitioners that Petitioner No.1 sold 158 Quintal 34 Kg. rice of F.C.I. tender to Gurukrupa Trading Company, Kim (Gujrat) vide Bill No.157 dated 23rd May, 2016 and it was loaded in Truck bearing Registration No.MH222955 of which Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 were driver and cleaner respectively. It is submitted that Petitioner No.1 also sold rice of F.C.I. tender weighing 158 Quintal 30 Kg. to Seeta Agro Industries, Sanand through bill No.158 dated 23rd May, 2016 and loaded the same in Truck bearing registration No.MH21D9895 on which Petitioner Nos.4 and 5 were driver and cleaner respectively. It is the case of the Petitioners that on 24th May, 2016, while both the trucks were passing from Chalisgaon road, near Toll Naka, police of Chalisgaon City Chowk police station stopped both the trucks and seized the rice and trucks only on the suspicion that rice was of public distribution system and did not allow the drivers and cleaners to proceed further. The police head constable at City Chowk Police Station, Chalisgaon registered an offence vide Crime No.54 of 2016 for the offences punishable under Section 6(4) and 9 of the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 and under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It is the case of the Petitioner that police investigated into the matter and during entire investigation it was not found that the seized rice was out of public distribution system, still the police have filed charge-sheet before the J.M.F.C. Chalisgaon on 18th January, 2017 and the same was registered as R.C.C. No.22 of 2017 and the J.M.F.C. Chalisgaon passed an order of issuing summons to the accused. Hence this Petition is filed by the Petitioners, praying therein to quash and set aside the said charge-sheet.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, referring to the copies of the bills, submitted that Petitioner No.1 has purchased the food articles including rice from one Poonamchand Agrawal and those were sold to the traders namely, Gurukrupa Trading Company and Seeta Agro Industries. The rice bags were loaded in the trucks for supply of the same to the above said traders but the police had stopped the said trucks alleging that the said rice bags were out of public distribution system. It is submitted that copies of said sale bills were handed over to both the drivers for su


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top