RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

1. Since both these Petitions are identical and since the petitioners are identically placed, we have taken up both these matters together for hearing.

2. The petitioners in Writ Petition No.2786/2008 have put-forth prayer Clauses 26-B, C & D, which read as under :-

26-B. The Order and Judgment passed by the Hon. Member, Industrial Court, Jalgaon in Complaint ULP No.4/2002 dated 18.10.2007 may kindly be quashed and set aside.

26-C. The appropriate writ may kindly be issued against the respondents to appoint the petitioner No.2 as per the resolution passed by the respondent No.3 by accepting the application preferred by the petitioner No.1.

26-D. The direction may kindly be issued to the respondent to appoint the petitioner No.2 as an employee in place of the petitioner No.1 who is retired from the respondent No.3 on medical ground.

3. The petitioners in Writ Petition No.2882/2008 have put-forth prayer Clauses 25-B, C & D, which read as under :-

25-B. The Order and Judgment passed by the Hon. Member, Industrial Court, Jalgaon in Complaint ULP No.5/2002 dated 18.10.2007 may kindly be quashed and set aside.

25-C. The appropriate writ may kindly be issued agains