R.K.DESHPANDE, M.G.GIRATKAR
Sumeet Kishor Nandeshwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
M.G. Giratkar, J.
1. The Criminal Application is admitted and heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the respective parties.
2. It is submitted that the applicant is a businessman doing business with a name and style “M/s. UN Multitech Engineers and Contractors” having partnership firm and doing the business of constructing the PEB Sheds by taking various contracts. On 19.9.2016, an agreement between the applicant and respondent no.2 was executed. The said agreement is having several conditions and the same is incorporated between the applicant and respondent no.2 and the same is duly signed and accepted by both the parties. As per the terms of the agreement, the present applicant used to prepare the various maps as per the work allotted to the present applicant. Due to various changes made by respondent no.2, the applicant was not allowed to start work at the said site for the reasons best known to respondent no.2. Without there being any intimation from respondent no.2, present applicant has received a mail cancelling the agreement from the side of respondent no.2. Applicant came to know the fact that respondent no.2 was not agreeable to confirm the inc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.