S.B. Shukre, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants at length. None appears for the respondent. Admit. Taken up for final hearing pursuant to the order dated 29th March 2017.

2. By this revision application, legality and correctness of the order passed on 26.10.2016 below an adjournment application (exhibit 71) by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur in Special Civil Suit No. 850 of 2009 has been questioned.

3. Shri Patrikar, learned counsel for the applicants has taken me through the series of applications filed for adjourning the suit by the respondent which are forming part of paper book of this revision application. These applications are dated 17.6.2016 (exhibit 59), dated 30.8.2016 (exhibit 62), dated 20.9.2016 (exhibit 63D), dated 6.10.2016 (exhibit 65) and dated 21.10.2016 (exhibit 68). All these applications were filed by the respondent for seeking adjournment. First application (exhibit 59) was filed on the ground of non-availability of the respondent in town as he was on pilgrimage. Second application (exhibit 62) was filed on the ground that the respondent was suffering from viral fever. Subsequent applications (exhibits 63D, 65 and 68) were also filed o