SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 2108

C.V.BHADANG
Bicholim Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ahamed Actar Shaikh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri R.G. Ramani
For the Respondent: Shri Balkrishna Sardessai

JUDGMENT :

C.V. Bhadang, J.

Heard. Rule made returnable forthwith. The learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1, waives service. Heard finally by consent of parties.

2. The petitioner had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act, for short), against the respondent No. 1 before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ponda. Admittedly, the said complaint was filed within the limitation, as provided under Section 142 of the said Act. Undisputedly, the said complaint was filed in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Ponda, where the payee bank (Banker of the petitioner), was situated.

3. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dashrath Roopsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2014 SC 3519, inter alia held that such a complaint has to be filed in the Court, within whose jurisdiction, the drawee bank is situated. Admittedly, the drawee bank, in this case, is situated at Panaji. On the basis of the judgment in the case of Dashrath Roopsingh Rathod (supra), the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, by an order dated 29.09.2014, returned the complaint for presentation to the proper Court. The papers were physically returned
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top