SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 315

S.B.SHUKRE
Namdeo – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Aditya Mane
For the Respondent: H.D. Dubey

JUDGMENT :

1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 29/09/2017 rendered in Sessions Trial Case No.25/2007 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, District Yavatmal, this appeal has been preferred by the appellant.

2. The appellant as well as the injured person were residents of village Amdapur, Tahsil Umerkhed, District Yavatmal. Both were agriculturists owning agricultural lands, which were adjoining to each other. The way to the field of the injured person Kailash Zamre passed through the field of the appellant. Few days before the incident, which took place in the night of 10/02/2007 at village Amdapur, the appellant, it is alleged, had closed the usual access to the field of the injured person and provided some other way, which was a circuitous route. This was protested by the injured person and his family members, which ultimately led to a civil dispute, being filed before the Civil Court at Umerkhed. It is alleged that because of pendency of this dispute, the appellant had a grudge against Kailash Zamre.

3. In the night of 10/02/2007 at about 09:00 p.m., Kailash Zamre took out his motorcycle for going to village Shirmal. At the village Chaodi, which is a prominent squ

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top