1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, at the stage of admission itself, by consent of Mr. Rananaware, learned counsel for the Petitioners, and Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the Respondents.

2. By this Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are challenging the order dated 4th October 2017 passed by the District Judge-3, Satara, thereby allowing the Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.96 of 2017, which Appeal was preferred by the Respondents herein challenging the order dated 6th May 2017 passed by the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara, below “Exhibit-5” in Regular Civil Suit No.480 of 2014.

3. The Petitioners herein are the Original Plaintiffs, who had filed the Suit for declaration that, they are the owners and in possession of the suit property and for perpetual injunction, restraining the Respondents from creating obstruction to their peaceful possession over the suit property. Along with the Suit, they had filed the application for interim injunction at “Exhibit-5”, which came to be allowed by the Trial Court. However, in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal preferred against the same, the order of interim i