V.M.DESHPANDE
Hitendra Kumar Panditrao Palaspagar – Appellant
Versus
Nilima Hitendrakumar Palaspagar – Respondent
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard Mr. U. J. Deshpande, Advocate for applicant and Mrs. K. R. Dhole, A.P.P. for non applicant no.1.
2. By the present revision, the applicant is challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wardha in Regular Criminal Case No.518/2010 together with judgment and order passed by learned District Judge, Wardha in Criminal Appeal No.50/2013 by which the learned lower appellate Court, though partly allowed the appeal filed on behalf of the applicant, has enhanced the reduced maintenance granted to the non applicant by the learned Magistrate from Rs.3000/- to Rs. 6000/- to the non applicant and from Rs.2000/- to Rs.4000/- to her daughter.
3. Few facts giving rise to the present revision are as under. Marriage of the applicant no.1 with non applicant took place on 16.02.2010. It was an arranged marriage. The non applicant, vide application under section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act claimed various reliefs including the grant of maintenance.
4. The application was registered as Misc. Criminal Case No.518/2010. The application was contested by the non applicant. The parties went to trial. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.