T.V.NALAWADE, S.M.GAVHANE
Krushna – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
S.M. GAVHANE, J.
1. The appellants original accused Nos.1 and 2 who have been convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- [Rupees One Thousand] in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month, each, for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code [for short 'the IPC'] as per the judgment and order dated 12.06.2013 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, Dist. Beed in Sessions Case No.73/2012 have preferred this appeal challenging the said conviction and sentence.
2. The prosecution case as it appears from the police papers, is as under:
(A) Accused No.1 is the son and accused No.2 is the widow of the deceased Jagannath Bhaguji Sirsath. Angad and Urmila (PW4) are the other issues of the deceased and the accused No.2. Angad was residing at Pune at the relevant time. The deceased was residing in a house constructed in his agricultural land at Bhaijalivasti – Jahangirmoha alongwith the accused and Urmila (PW4). The informant Kushaba Bhaguji Sirsat (PW3) is the brother of the deceased. He owns agricultural land and house adjoining the agricultural land of the deceased. PW3 used
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.