1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for respondent No.1, learned counsel for respondent No.34 and respondent No.32 in person.

2. Rule.

3. Rule is made returnable forthwith with the consent of parties to this petition.

4. By this Writ Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 04.01.2014, passed below Exh.276, by 8th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Misc. Application No.21 of 2008.

5. Application at Exh.276 was filed by the petitioners herein, under Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for appointment of Administrator pedente lite, in the Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 21 of 2008, which was filed for revocation of the will dated 26th April, 2006, executed by the father of the petitioners namely Dr. N.G. Dastane. Respondent No.32 is the daughter and respondent No.33 is the wife of late Dr. Dastane and both these respondents are supporting the case of the petitioners.

6. At the outset itself, it has to be stated that this writ petition has a chequered history of litigation. Several proceedings instituted by the petitioners and respondent No.32 are pending in t