SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 492

MANISH PITALE
Hemant – Appellant
Versus
Indirabai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.M. Bhangde.
For the Respondent: S.V. Purohit.

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellants herein are the unsuccessful plaintiffs who have challenged concurrent findings rendered against them by the two Courts below.

2. The facts leading up to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellants-plaintiffs are the descendants of one Ramchandra Ingole while the respondents-defendants are the descendants of Trimbakrao Ingole, the elder brother of the aforesaid Ramchandra. It is an admitted position that there was partition of joint family property between the aforesaid two brothers in the year 1952 and that thereafter they started residing separately. It is the contention of the appellants-plaintiffs that in the year 1957 the aforesaid Ramchandra and Trimbakrao jointly purchased suit property, being plot at F.S. No. 42, mouza Rajapeth Bhargare, Badnera, district Amravati in Ward No. 40 admeasuring 7011 sq. ft. with house No. 240 thereon. The plaintiffs claimed that sale deed in respect of the said property was executed in favour of Ramchandra and Trimbakrao on 29.03.1957 and it was presented for registration in the office of the Registrar on the same day and that thereafter on 03.05.1957, the aforesaid sale deed stood registered.

3. The said r

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top