1. By this petition, the Petitioner Corporation has challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 15.07.1993 by which, Complaint (ULP) No. 17/1992 filed by the Respondent/original Complainant has been allowed and the second show cause notice proposing the punishment of dismissal from service dated 17.06.1992, is quashed and set aside on the basis of evidence freshly adduced and without framing an issue as to whether, the enquiry is fair and proper and whether, the findings of the Enquiry Officer are perverse.

2. The Petitioner is also aggrieved by the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 27.03.2003 by which, the Industrial Court partly allowed Revision (ULP) No. 91/1993 filed by the Petitioner and yet, granted the same relief that was granted by the Labour Court.

3. On 05.05.2004, this Court has admitted the petition and issued Rule on interim relief. On 27.07.2004, this Court noted that the notice of rule was served on the Respondent/ Workman and he has not caused his appearance either in person or through an Advocate. It was further noted that the Respondent w