SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 2284

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
R.K. Deshpande, M.G. Giratkar, JJ.
Narendra s/o Balaji Ghodmare - Petitioner
Vs.
Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Gadchiroli and another - Respondents
W.P. No. 4549 of 2013
Decided On : 08-11-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: R.S. Parsodkar
For the Respondents: Smt. M.H. Deshmukh, Ms. Kirti Sapute

The main legal point established is that once a community is included in the Scheduled Tribes list, it must be recognized as a Scheduled Tribe as per the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. The affinity test should not be the sole criteria to reject a claim for Scheduled Tribe status.

Headnote:

Scheduled Tribe - Mana - Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950, and its amendments, particularly focusing on Entry No. 18 which includes the 'Mana' community as a recognized Scheduled Tribe. The court also referred to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976, and various judicial decisions interpreting the legal provisions related to Scheduled Tribes.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the cancellation of his Scheduled Tribe certificate for 'Mana' by the Scrutiny Committee. The Committee rejected the petitioner's claim based on the community's inclusion in the Scheduled Tribes list, migration history, and affinity test. The court analyzed the historical background and legal provisions related to the 'Mana' community's status as a recognized Scheduled Tribe.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Committee erred in rejecting the petitioner's claim based on historical migration and affinity test. It held that the 'Mana' community is a recognized Scheduled Tribe under Entry No. 18 of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950, and the petitioner had established his claim for 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe.

Issues: The issues involved the validity of the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe certificate for 'Mana', the interpretation of legal provisions related to Scheduled Tribes, and the application of historical evidence and affinity test in determining Scheduled Tribe status.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the legal principle that once a community is included in the Scheduled Tribes list, it must be recognized as a Scheduled Tribe as per the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. The court also emphasized that the affinity test should not be the sole criteria to reject a claim for Scheduled Tribe status.

Final Decision: The court quashed the Committee's order, upheld the petitioner's claim for 'Mana' Scheduled Tribe, and directed the Committee to issue a validity certificate within one month.

JUDGMENT :

R.K. Deshpande, J.

The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 11-6-2013 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Gadchiroli, Division Nagpur, invalidating the claim of the petitioner for ‘Mana’ (Scheduled Tribe Category), and consequently cancelling and confiscating the certificate dated 1-8-2011 issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bramhapuri, in the name of the petitioner as belonging to ‘Mana’, Scheduled Tribe, which is an Entry No. 18 in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

2. Before the Committee, the petitioner produced about six documents indicating his caste and that of his forefathers and blood relatives as ‘Mana”. The document produced pertaining to the pre-constitution period is in respect of the great grandfather Madho s/o Ako Mana, which is a revenue record of the year produced was in the name of Lavha s.o Madho, who was the grandfather of the petitioner showing the caste ‘Mana’ in the revenue record of the year 1970-71. The petitioner also produced the caste validity certificate issued by the same Committee in the name of Gangadhar Balaji Ghodmare, the real brother of the petitioner, showing his caste as ‘Mana’. The Police Vigilance Cell of the Committee conducted an enquiry and found that all these documents indicate the caste of the petitioner and his forefathers and blood relatives as ‘Mana’. The relationship of the petitioner with the persons in whose names the documents are executed is admitted to be of blood relation.

3. The Committee records the finding that the entries in the school and revenue records of the blood relatives of the petitioner for the period from 1921-22 to 1977 consistently records the caste ‘Mana’. However, all such documents are rejected mainly on the following reasoning :

(a) that ‘Mana’ community was included in the list of Scheduled Tribes in relation to the State of Maharashtra for the first time in the year 1960, that too in the specified area only, and the petitioner has failed to establish that he or his forefathers hail from the said area and migrated to the present place of their residence, from the said specified scheduled area.

(b) that there are non-tribal communities like ‘Badwaik Mana’, ‘Khand Mana’, ‘Kshatriya Mana’, ‘Kunbi Mana’, ‘Maratha Mana’, ‘Gond Mana’, ‘Mani’/’Mane’, etc., and the petitioner has failed to satisfy crucial affinity test to establish that he belongs to ‘Mana, Scheduled Tribe’, which is an entry at Serial No. 18 in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950,

(c) that in the year 1967, ‘Mana’ community was included in the list of Other Backward Classes at Serial No. 268 and later on in the list of Special Backward Classes at Serial No. 2 in relation to the State of Maharashtra, and

(d) that the documents produced simply indicate the caste as ‘Mana’ and not ‘Mana, Scheduled Tribe’.

4. The President issued the Constitutional (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 in exercise of the power conferred by clause (2) of Article 342 of the Constitution of India. By clause 2 of that Order, it was provided that the tribes or tribal communities, or parts of, or groups within, tribes or tribal communities, specified in Parts I to XXII of the Scheduled to the Order shall, in relation to the States to which those Parts respective relate, be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes so far as regards members thereof residents in the localities specified in relation to them respectively in those Parts of that Schedule.

5. Initially, Entry No. 12 in the relevant Part in the Schedule to the Order read as “Gond, including Madia (Maria) and Mudia (Muria)”. By the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act No. 63 of 1956, the said Entry No. 12 was substituted by Entry No. 12 in paragraph 7 of Part VIII(A) of the Schedule to the Order, which was as follows :

“7. In (1) Melghat tahsil of the Amravati district.

(2) Gadchiroli and Sironcha tahsils of the Chanda district.

(3) Kelapur, Wani and Yeotmal tasils of the Yeotmal district :

12

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top