The appellant has filed the present appeal against the judgment and order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, in Sessions Trial No. 24/2013, decided on 20th of April, 2016, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offense punishable under sections 376 and 323 of Indian Penal Code. For the offense under section 376 of Indian Penal Code, the appellant has been convicted to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-; in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and is sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.500/-; in default to suffer simple imprisonment for seven days for the offense punishable under section 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. It was the case of the prosecution that the appellant, who is hereinafter referred to as the accused committed rape on the prosecutrix on 27th of January, 2013, at about 2 p.m. at the house of the said prosecutrix. As is revealing from the material on record, the prosecutrix is physically handicapped and also suffers from speech impairment. It was alleged that on the day of the incident, when the mother and brother of the prosecutrix had left the house, and prosecutrix alone was at her house, the accused reached there and asked the prosecutrix to allow him to have sexual intercourse with her. The prosecutrix refused for the same whereupon the accused, by using force against the prosecutrix, had forcible intercourse with her. Because of the shouts given by the prosecutrix, two ladies, namely, Gavlanbai and Khobrabai came on the spot. By that time the accused had fled from the said spot. The prosecutrix disclosed the alleged incident to her mother after she returned to home in the evening. The report of the alleged incident was lodged on 2nd of February, 2013 at Police Station, Pimpaladari. On the report so lodged by the prosecutrix, offense under sections 376 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against the accused and the investigation was set in motion. The prosecutrix was sent for her medical examination at Sub District Hospital, Gangakhed. She was also referred to the Psychiatrist at Civil Hospital, Parbhani. The Investigating Officer visited the spot of occurrence, prepared spot panchnama, seized the clothes on person of the prosecutrix, and recorded the statements of the necessary witnesses. The blood and vaginal swab samples as well as the clothes on the person of the prosecutrix were sent for chemical analysis and the reports were obtained. The accused was arrested on the same day and the clothes on his person were also seized by the Police. They were also forwarded to the Chemical Analyzer. After completing investigation, charge-sheet was filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class at Gangakhed. Since the offense under section 376 of Indian Penal Code was exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, committed the case to the Sessions Court at Gangakhed. The learned Additional Sessions Judge framed charge against the accused on 16-3-2015. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

3. In order to prove the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined as many as 11 witnesses. Prosecution evidence commenced with the testimony of the mother of the prosecutrix, namely, Chandrakala, and was concluded after the evidence of Investigating Officer, namely, Ajit Tukaram Chintala was recorded. The accused has denied the charges levelled against him and has taken the defense of his false implication. According to the accused, since he did not concede to the proposal given by the mother of the prosecutrix that he should marry with the prosecutrix, a false complaint has been filed against him. The learned Additional Sessions Judge after assessing the oral and documentary evidence brought on record held the accused guilty for an offense punishable under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under secti