SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 2299

G.S.KULKARNI
Deepali Santosh Lokhande – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Vasantrao Lokhande – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Abhijit D. Sarwate, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Ganesh Sovani, Advocate

ORDER :

G.S. Kulkarni, J.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The challenge in this petition is to an order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court at Pune rejecting application dated 18th August 2017 filed on behalf of the petitioner wife, by which the petitioner had prayed that the documents produced by her (Exhibits 198 and 292) along with her application being medical bills, receipts issued by the school authorities, prescriptions, medical receipts, hospital discharge card, x ray reports etc. be exhibited in the proceedings. This application was contested by respondent husband contending that before these documents are exhibited, the documents are required to be proved by the petitioner by examining the author of the documents or such appropriate witnesses. The learned Judge of the Family Court considering rival pleas and treating those documents as electronic evidence falling within the purview of the provisions of section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, has rejected the said application by the impugned order. A review application against the said order was also rejected.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, in assailing the impugned order, contends that there is an appa















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top