A.M. Badar, J.

1. By this petition, the petitioner/accused in Criminal Case No. 307/SW/2014 is praying for quashing the proceedings initiated by respondent No.1 herein, who is the original complainant before the learned Magistrate. Heard the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner/accused at sufficient length of time. He took me through the averments made in the complaint lodged by respondent No.1/original complainant, order of issuance of process passed by the learned Magistrate as well as the report submitted by police under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C). Reliance is also placed on registered agreement in respect of purchase of land and receipts in the name of the petitioner/accused. By drawing my attention to the letter dated 29th January 2014 sent by respondent No.1/original complainant, the learned advocate for the petitioner/accused argued that this letter is as vague as it can be and it is not mentioning the amount allegedly paid by respondent No.1/original complainant to the petitioner/accused. The same is countered by reply dated 5th February 2014 with a contention that the land was purchased by the petitioner/accused from his own re