SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 896

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.S. SHINDE, V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
Subhash alias Chabu Mahsuji Nikalje - Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 395 of 2013
Decided On : 18-06-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. G.D. Kale
For the Respondent: Mr. S.Y. Mahajan

The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on circumstantial evidence and the testimony of a minor witness to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt in a case of assault and murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Headnote:

Section 302 - Indian Penal Code - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code - The court convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life. The court also convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years. The trial Court directed that both the sentences shall run concurrently.

Fact of the Case:

The accused was convicted for the offence of punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting and killing his wife. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, including the testimony of the accused's minor daughter who witnessed the accused assaulting her mother with a wooden log. The accused denied the charges and claimed to be tried.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty based on the circumstantial evidence and the testimony of the minor daughter, which was deemed trustworthy and reliable. The court noted the injuries sustained by the deceased and the conduct of the accused after the incident, including his absconding for over ten months, as supporting the prosecution's case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the circumstantial evidence and the testimony of the minor daughter were sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the chain of circumstances, including the conduct of the accused and the consistent testimony of witnesses, established the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The court also rejected the argument that there was no intention to kill the wife, citing the nature of the assault and the accused's conduct after the incident.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused was given the benefit of set off under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

JUDGMENT :

S.S. Shinde, J.

1. This Appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 18th May, 2012, passed by the Additional Session Judge-2, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.3 of 2011 thereby convicting the accused-Appellant for the offence of punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short "I.P. Code") and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, to suffer further simple imprisonment for three months. The trial Court also convicted accused for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of the I.P. Code and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for the period of three years and in default of payment of fine, to suffer further simple imprisonment for one and half months. The trial Court directed that both the sentences shall run concurrently.

2. The Prosecution case, in brief, is as under:

A. The accused is husband of deceased Anita. Yogita is a minor daughter of deceased, Sachin and Ganesh are minor sons of deceased. The accused was residing along with his wife and children in rented room situated at Indira Nagar, Aurangabad. The accused was doing mason work. The accused was in habit of drinking liquor. The accused used to take doubt upon the chastity of his wife Anita. The accused used to demand money from his wife for consuming liquor and on that count he used to quarrel with her. The complainant is the husband of sister of deceased Anita. Deceased Anita used to tell about her ill-treatment to the complainant and his wife. The complainant has tried to convince the accused about the same but he did not listen.

B. On 4th October, 2009, at evening time the accused came at his house under the influence of liquor and he started giving abuses to his wife Anita. The deceased was cooking food in kitchen room. However, the accused was giving abuses to her due to which the deceased and her daughter Yogita had not taken dinner during night time. The accused has given threats by saying that he will kill his wife during night time. Thereafter, the deceased had slept in the house. The daughter of the deceased namely Yogita had also slept in the house. During night time at about 1.30 a.m., accused assaulted the deceased on her head by means of wooden log due to which the deceased has sustained Contused Lacerated Wound [for short 'CLW'] over right mostroid region scalp, CLW over right ear tinna and contused abrasion over inner side of lower lip. The daughter of deceased namely Yogita heard noise due to which she has awaken. She had seen her father i.e. accused standing near cot of the deceased having wooden log in his hand. The accused has thrown the said wooden log and he fled away from the spot. Yogita had seen the injuries caused to her mother due to which she started shouting by uttering words 'MAMMICHA KAN TUTLARE - KAN TUTLARE'. Immediately thereafter, the land lady of the deceased namely Kaushalyabai Jadhav and one Saralabai came in the house of the deceased. Yogita told them that her father i.e. accused, had killed her mother by causing injury by means of wooden log and he fled away. Thereafter, Yogita and landlady Kaushalyabai went towards the house of Kerubhan Bhima Kedare situated at Garkheda. Yogita has narrated the said incident to Kerubhan Kedare. Thereafter Yogita, landlady Kaushalyabai and Kerubhan came at the house of the deceased during night time. At that time, the accused was not in his house. Thereafter Yogita and Kerubhan Kedare had taken the injured Anita to GHATI Hospital during the night time. Anita died at about 3.30 a.m. during that night while taking treatment in the Hospital. Thereafter, Kerubhan Kedare has lodged report about the incident on 5th October, 2009 against the accused.

C. On the basis of the report lodged by the complainant, crime No.I-165/2009 has been registered against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the I.P. Code. The spot panchnama of offence has been prepared. At






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top