SHANTANU KEMKAR, NITIN W.SAMBRE
Shobha Atmaram Prabhu – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
1. Heard Petitioner No.4 in person, who is a Lawyer by profession and who represents the interest of other Petitioners.
2. The Petitioner No.1 appears to be the mother of Petitioner Nos. 2, 4 and Respondent No. 3 and mother-in-law of Petitioner No. 3. The Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 appears to be husband and wife.
3. The Petition is filed with following prayers :-
“(A) By an appropriate writ, order and/or direction of this Hon'ble Court, this Hon'ble Court be kind enough to assign C.A.No.1061/2012 to any appropriate Hon'ble Judge from District Court Shivajinagar Pune, other than the Hon'ble Judge hearing C.A.No.123/2016 and Hon'ble Shri S. M. Modak, the appeal may kindly be made time bound, preferably within 30 days, the parties may kindly be restricted to filing of purshis and applications of adjournment, that too on genuine grounds.
(B) Pending the hearing and order of prayer clause (A), this Hon'ble Court be kind enough to issue an appropriate writ, order and/or direction to say the proceedings of C.A.No.1061/2012.
(C) Ad-interim and interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause (B) may kindly be granted.
(D) This Hon'ble Court be kind enough to give guidelines, whet
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and another vs. Union of India
Bell Finvest (India) Limited V/s Official Liquidator of M/s. Rtec System(I) Pvt. Ltd.
Chetak Construction Ltd. V/s Om Prakash and Others
R.K. Anand V/s Registrar, Delhi High Court
Satish Mahadeorao Uke V/s Registrar, High Court of Bombay, Bench at Nagpur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.