RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Shantabai Kautik Ghule – Appellant
Versus
Collector Aurangabad – Respondent
The Petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 27.04.2017 by which, the Additional Collector, Aurangabad has rejected Dispute Application No.Kannad/CR/10/2017 filed by the Petitioner challenging the passing of no confidence motion against her on 21.02.2017.
2. I have considered the strenuous submissions of the learned Advocates for the respective sides.
3. The contentions of the Petitioner can be summarized as under:-
(a) The "no-confidence" requisition circulated by 07 members out of 09 of the Barkatpur-Raigaon Group Gram Panchayat is dated 10.02.2017.
(b) The said requisition is said to be tendered to the Tahasildar on 15.02.2017 against the Petitioner, who is a lady Sarpanch of the said village panchayat.
(c) The special meeting was convened on 21.02.2017, which can be said to be beyond the requisite 07 days period, within which such special meeting is to be convened.
(d) No notice was ever served upon the Petitioner by the Tahasildar, though all other members have received the said notice.
(e) By the circular dated 24.04.2017 issued by the Revenue and Forest Department, State of Maharashtra, the charge with the Additional Collector to deal with all disputes pertaining
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.