S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, BHARATI H.DANGRE
Isha Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Tata Institute of Social Sciences – Respondent
1. At the outset, the name of respondent no.2 is deleted from the array of parties.
2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking the following relief’s.
(a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue Writ of certiorari and or any other appropriate writ as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case setting aside and quashing the impugned email dated 19th June, 2018 of respondent nos.1, Exhibit “L” to Petition as being illegal, bad in law, malafide, ulterior, arbitrary unilateral and void.
(b) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directly the Respondent no.1 allow the petitioner to pursue her course of MPH-HPEF, 2018-20, subject to the submission of final year mark sheet by September, 2018 and consider and exemption for nonattendance of classes since 19th June, 2018”.
3. In view of the earlier order passed by us, we grant Rule on this petition. Since all affidavits have been placed on record, by consent of both sides, Rule is made returnable forthwith.
4. The above two relief’s are claimed in the following facts and circumstances.
The Tata In
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.