T.V.NALAWADE, VIBHA KANKANWADI
Mangesh S/o Laxmikant Bhalerao – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard finally.
2. Present application has been filed by the original accused persons for quashing the first information report lodged by respondent no. 02, with Kranti Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad, bearing Crime No. 0114/2018, for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 506, 323, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Applicant no. 01 is the husband of respondent no. 02. Applicant no. 02 is the father of applicant no. 01. Applicant no. 03 is brother of applicant no. 01. Applicant no. 04 is wife of applicant no. 03.
4. Respondent no. 02, who is Doctor by profession, stated that she got married to applicant no. 01 on 01.04.2010. Thereafter, she resided with applicant no. 01 at Pune, Bangalore, London and Aurangabad. She has got daughter by name, Nitya, from applicant no. 01. It is stated that since the date of her marriage, her husband, her husband's father, husband's brother and brother's wife were depending upon her income and they used to ask her about money all the time. In case, she refused she was harassed mentally and physically. When she refused to give money, at that time, hu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.