MANGESH S.PATIL
Deepak S/o Vasantrao Kesari – Appellant
Versus
Shriram S/o Mukundrao Kalyankar – Respondent
Rule. The rule is made returnable forthwith. Mr. J.M. Murkute, learned Advocate waives service for respondents no.1 and 2 and the learned APP waives service for the respondents no.3 to 5. With the consent of both the sides, the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.
2. The learned advocate for the petitioner vehemently submits that the learned Magistrate had rightly directed investigation under Sub Section 3 of Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on an application filed by the petitioner bearing No. OMCA No. 522/2015 by order dated 8/6/2015 but has committed a gross error which has resulted in miscarriage of justice when the self same Magistrate without having any power under the Code of Criminal Procedure recalled his earlier order by the impugned order dated 15/10/2015. The Magistrate had no such jurisdiction to recall his own order and has committed gross illegality. He referred to and relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Subramanium Sethuraman Vs. State of Maharashtra and another, (2004) 13 SCC 324 and Iris Computers Limited Vs Askari Infotech Private Limited and others, (2015) 14 SCC 399.
3. The learned advocate for the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.