SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 1526

C.V.BHADANG
Dhanu Bogati – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ryan Menezes.
For the Respondent: P. Faldessai.

JUDGMENT :

1. The challenge in this petition under section 482 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure (Code, for short) is to the judgment and order dated 5th February 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa at Margao in Criminal Revision Application No. 92 of 2014. By the impugned judgment the learned Session Judge, while dismissing the Criminal Revision Application filed by the petitioners has confirmed the order dated 3rd July 2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Margao, in Criminal Misc. Application No. 264/2013/F. By the said order, the learned Magistrate had directed registration of the F.I.R. while acting under section 156(3) of the Code.

2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the petition may be stated thus:

That the 1st petitioner is a Police Sub Inspector while the 2nd Petitioner is a Constable working in the Goa Police Force. In February 2013, the petitioners were deployed with the special tourist police unit, which was entrusted with the task of protecting the tourists and implementation of the provision of Goa Registration of Tourist Trade Act, 1982 that governs tourism related activities in the State. On 10th Febru








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top