SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 2589

T.V.NALAWADE, A.M.DHAVALE
Gajendrasingh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M.V. Ghatge h/f B.N. Gadegaonkar, Advs.
For the Respondents: P.G. Borade, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

A.M. DHAVALE, J.

1. This is petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner, vide prayer clause (A) seeks quashing of charge-sheet No. 103 of 2010 submitted before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nanded in respect of F.I.R. No. 128/2010 dated 3.6.2010, registered at Vajirabad Police Station, Nanded and directions for reinvestigation in the matter. Vide prayer clause (B), petitioner seeks directions to respondents No. 1 and 2 to initiate enquiry against respondent No. 3 for manipulation of the record in the investigation of above referred case.

2. The facts relevant for deciding the present petition may be stated as follows:

3. The petitioner Gajendrasingh filed the above referred F.I.R. at Vajirabad Police on 3.6.2010 to the effect that on 2.6.2010 at 11.00 a.m., he was standing in front of his house by the side of road. That time, respondent No. 4 Rajendrasingh, respondent No. 5 Ramsingh and respondent No. 6 Deepsingh were standing by his side. That time, accused Jagbirsingh came to the spot in a gypsy and started abusing him. That time, respondent

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top