SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 1744

M.G.GIRATKAR
Dinguram Ramaji Sangore – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.A. Mohta, Adv., N.B. Jawade, Adv., Shashikant Borkar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

M.G. GIRATKAR, J.

1. All the revisions are against the judgment of conviction dated 06.03.2007 awarded by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli in Regular Criminal Case No. 44 of 2003 for the offence punishable under Sections 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. All the applicants are convicted for the offence punishable under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for the period of six months with fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, in default, to suffer RI for one month. All the applicants sentenced to suffer RI for six months and fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, in default, RI for one month for the offence punishable under Section 120B.

2. All the applicants/accused moved before Sessions Court by filing criminal appeals. The said appeals came to be dismissed vide judgment dated 27th October, 2009. Hence, all the applicants/accused before this Court in the respective revisions.

3. The case against the applicants (hereinafter referred as "accused" for the sake of brevity) in short is that one Smt. Rahidas was working as a nurse in Primary Health Center, Subhashgram. She lodged a report against accused Tridev Majumdar and Dinbandhu Samaddar.




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top